High Frequency Trading Regulation - White Papers

From MarketsReformWiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Page sponsor.gif
Become sponsor.gif
PFG.jpg


Dodd-Frank Timeline, Proposed Interpretive Order on Disruptive Practices
Proposal Date Comment Deadline Final Rule Issue
March 18, 2011 May 17, 2011 First Qtr. 2012

Contents

SIFMA - Impact of High Frequency Trading and Considerations for Regulatory Change, December 13, 2011

December 13, 2011

The SIFMA white paper highlights some of the regulatory measures that have been put into place or are currently being considered, as well as other areas that warrant further study and possible regulatory action. Those areas include:

The white paper also points out certain proposals that have been suggested by regulators that may have unintended negative consequences, such as:

Read white paper.png

Bank for International Settlements - High-frequency trading in the foreign exchange market, September 2011

September 2011

The report presents the results of a fact-finding exercise conducted by a Study Group consisting of FX market experts from 14 BIS Markets Committee member central banks. It consists of the following six sections:

Read white paper.png


Guidelines on systems and controls in a highly automated trading environment for trading platforms, investment firms and competent authorities - July 2011

July 2011
Contents of the paper:

executing orders on behalf of clients and/or dealing on own account.

ESMA accepted public comments on this paper until October 3, 2011.

Read white paper.png

The Brattle Group: Trading at the Speed of Light: The Impact of High-Frequency Trading on Market Performance, Regulatory Oversight, and Securities Litigation - 2011

Conclusions from the white paper:

"In principle, high-frequency trading should not have a large impact on prices, given that HFT firms control very little capital and take minute, very brief positions in securities. Moreover, high-frequency traders can provide greater liquidity and market efficiency, either by acting as market-makers or as statistical arbitrageurs across markets. On the other hand, errant or poorly designed HFT programs without necessary risk controls could lead to occasional shocks or disruptive events, such as those we have witnessed globally over the past year. In addition, the implementation of certain HFT strategies has raised concerns about their fairness, given the availability of certain tools to high-frequency traders that are not widely available to other types of investors.

As a result of the controversies surrounding HFT and other less transparent corners of the markets, the CFTC and SEC are conducting ongoing investigations of the impacts of these strategies, and proposing solutions to address their potentially adverse side-effects. Finally, the increased volume of HFT over the past decade creates several possible ramifications for securities litigation in the future, to the extent that it changes our understanding of market efficiency and other metrics that affect liability and damages estimation in lawsuits."

Read white paper.png

Deutsche Bank Research: High Frequency Trading:Better than its Reputation? - February 7, 2011

February 7, 2011

The white paper offers a summary of algorithmic and HFT terminology, strategies, impact analysis, economic perspective, and potential regulatory challenges.

Read white paper.png

Optiver: High Frequency Trading Position Paper - December, 2010

December, 2010

From the white paper:

Recent scientific research has shown that, when used for market making activities or employed in statistical arbitrage, HFT generally increases liquidity to the markets and reduces the volatility. Furthermore it reduces the spreads, leads to lower tick sizes and thus improves the overall market quality. These effects of HFT benefit all market participants, from small retail investors to large brokers and institutional investors.

Despite scientific research showing that HFT is generally beneficial to the market, there are many misconceptions. HFT is for example accused of withdrawing liquidity when markets are volatile, although the facts show that this is not the case. Examples of other misconceptions are HFT firms are sometimes accused of front running, that they benefit from quote stuffing strategies or that they have an unfair advantage over other market participant by using sponsored access or co-location.

Based on such misconceptions some regulators and politicians have recently proposed introduce additional regulations to limit the effect of HFT. Of all these proposals introducing a financial transaction tax will have the most dramatic impact on the quality of the market. Trading volumes would reduce significantly and liquidity and price discovery will be seriously impacted, thus harming not just HFT but all market participants. Other measures, such as imposing quoting obligations or minimum quote durations and reducing the speed with which HFT firms can trade will either result in wider spreads or reduced liquidity.

One proposal that Optiver believes will truly work and will not harm the quality of the market is the introduction of circuit breakers, which have already been implemented by several exchanges.

Read white paper.png

Jonathan Brogaard, Kellogg School of Management: High Frequency Trading and its Impact of Market Quality - July 16, 2010

July 16, 2010

Conclusions from the white paper:


Read white paper.png

References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox
John Lothian News
Contact Us